Microstakes Mastery: Analyzing a Big Blind Defense Hand

By

Playing microstakes online poker can be a grind, but it’s also a fertile training ground for honing fundamentals and exploring optimal strategies. After quite a few years of playing poker, I am still in microstakes. In this post, I’ll break down a hand I played at 0.01/0.02 NLHE, discussing my thought process, general play principles, and GTO (Game Theory Optimal) considerations.

The Setup

Table Dynamics: A 6-max table with one seat empty. 

Stacks:

  • Hero (Big Blind): $2.00
  • Player5 (Button): $3.95

The action folds around to the Button, who raises to $0.06, a standard 3x open-raise. The Small Blind folds, and I’m left to act with [2d, Ac] in the Big Blind.

Preflop Action

Hero’s Spot: Facing a button open, I have a decision to make with Ace-deuce offsuit. This is a borderline hand, but calling is reasonable for several reasons:

  1. Pot Odds: I need to call $0.04 to defend $0.09, giving me direct odds of 4.25:1. That’s sufficient to justify continuing with a hand that can flop top pair or other disguised value.
  2. GTO Defense: Against a button opening range (typically 40-50% of hands), Ace-deuce offsuit is near the bottom of my defendable range but still playable. Folding would be slightly too tight.
  3. Exploitation: Microstakes players often over-fold postflop, making speculative hands like this more profitable.

Alternative Play: A 3-bet to $0.18-$0.22 could pressure the Button’s wide range, but Ace-deuce offsuit lacks playability in 3-bet pots and out-of-position would make me uncomfortable. Flatting is safer.

Flop: [Ad, 4s, Kh]

Pot: $0.13

The flop gives me top pair with a weak kicker. Out of position (OOP), my options are:

  • Bet: Build the pot and deny equity to hands like suited connectors or low pocket pairs.
  • Check: Exercise pot control and allow the aggressor to continuation bet (c-bet) with their range.

I choose to check, which is standard OOP against a Button range. Player5 checks back, signaling possible showdown value (weaker Ax, Kx, or pocket pairs) or complete misses.

Turn: [As]

Board: [Ad, 4s, Kh, As]
Pot: $0.13

The turn pairs the board, giving me trips and significantly strengthening my hand.  Small possibility of a flush draw for the villain in the hand. Now, I lead with a bet of $0.08:

  1. Value Target: I’m targeting hands like Kx and pocket pairs. .
  2. Exploitation: At microstakes, players are often overly passive, meaning I’m unlikely to face a raise unless I’m beat.
  3. GTO Perspective: A small lead is balanced here, as I would also bet with bluffs (e.g., QJ, T9) and semi-bluffs (e.g., flush draws, which are absent on this board).

Result: Player5 folds, and I scoop the pot. Their fold likely indicates a hand with no showdown value (e.g., suited connectors or low pairs).

Post-Hand Analysis

Strengths:

  • Preflop: I defended appropriately against a wide Button range.
  • Flop Check: Allowed the aggressor to c-bet or reveal their weakness.
  • Turn Bet: Extracted value from marginal hands while denying equity to overcards or potential bluffs.

Improvement Opportunities:

  1. Consider a Preflop 3-Bet: While flatting is defensible, a small 3-bet could test Player5’s discipline and set up a lead on favourable flops.
  2. Larger Turn Bet: Given the passive tendencies at microstakes, a larger bet (e.g., $0.10-$0.12) may have extracted more value without risking folds from marginal hands.

GTO vs. Exploitative Play: GTO strategy advocates balanced ranges to prevent exploitation. Here, I leaned exploitative, assuming Player5’s wide range and postflop tendencies. This approach is effective at microstakes, where players often deviate significantly from optimal play.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

QQ with bad river card

By
Image
So in this hand I am happy with the play preflop and flop.  The flop is pretty good I think since I will get calls from lower pairs and flush draws. Betting the turn seems a good move too when the Jd hits.  The flush draw is still there, but weaker, and no overcards.  I am still going to bet out looking for value from lower pairs and charging the draws. I am sure that if the button has hit a set he would be raising the flop and if he hasn't done that he would almost certainly be raising the turn.  He doesn't so I think that I am still good. Then the river card comes. The cooler.  There is a big question as to whether the villain has got right the way to the river with just an over card, or possibly A2, A4, A8 or AJ I suppose.  Of course he might need to bluff the river with a busted flush draw. So I check on the river and see what he does..and he shoves.  Should I call or fold? PokerStars - $0.02 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players Hand conve...
Read more

Poker tip #1: Big Hand Big Pot, Small Hand Small Pot

By
Image
Reading and studying poker either online, reading forums, talking to friends or reading books always leads to different tips and tricks.  Deciphering which tips you are going to employ in your play takes time.  Whenever I ask a question about a hand I have played almost always the response is 'it depends' and then questions are asked about stack sizes, player behaviour, position, number of callers, number of limpers, history of the players, table image.  All of these are of course relevant questions and when developing as a poker player more and more I am able to ask myself these questions and consider how I want to play the hand.  Being able to do this consistently of course is key and still something that I want to develop in my game. Probably the one piece of advice that sticks with me however is one that I read in one of the Harrington on Holdem books.  If you haven't read any of these they should definitely be part of your library.  Harrington has bo...
Read more